Kampa Advisors nav logo

PROJECT DEFINITION, HEALTH CHECK & RECOVERY

Establish What Your Industrial Project Really Needs - Before More Time and Money Are Committed

Industrial projects do not always begin with a clear scope – and once delivery starts, reported progress does not always reflect the true engineering, commercial or operational position. Kampa Advisors provides independent, evidence-led intervention to establish what needs to be delivered and the controlled route forward.

Project Definition • Independent Health Check • Scope & CAPEX Challenge • Recovery Planning
Discuss Your Project
What We Assess

Independent Project Intervention

Define the Requirement, Verify the Position and Control the Route Forward

Kampa Advisors helps industrial clients establish:

  • What actually needs to be delivered.
  • What has already been completed.
  • What remains uncertain or uncontrolled.
  • What the realistic cost, programme and resource requirements should be.
  • What decisions are needed to move forward safely and effectively.

Whether the project is still being defined or already beginning to lose control, Kampa provides independent, evidence-led intervention.

When Control or Clarity Is Weakening

When Clients Engage Kampa

Clients engage Kampa when the proposed scope, reported position or route forward can no longer be accepted without independent challenge.

  • 01

    The initial CAPEX requirement has not been properly challenged.

  • 02

    Scope, requirements or acceptance criteria remain unclear.

  • 03

    Historic design decisions no longer reflect current operational needs.

  • 04

    Costs are increasing without a trusted forecast.

  • 05

    Contractors are progressing, but interfaces remain unowned.

  • 06

    Installation is moving ahead of engineering evidence or compliance.

  • 07

    FAT, commissioning or handover is approaching without sufficient control.

  • 08

    Senior management needs an independent view before approving the next stage.

Challenge the Problem Before Adding Resource

Kampa does not assume that the project needs more people or more money.

We first establish what problem the investment is intended to solve and what delivery structure is genuinely required.

Evidence-Led Review

What We Assess

The review is tailored to the project and the decisions facing the client.

Commercial, technical, compliance and operational evidence are considered together to establish one coherent project position.

The review may examine:

  • 01 Business need, scope and requirements.
  • 02 CAPEX basis and commercial assumptions.
  • 03 Programme, critical path and dependencies.
  • 04 Contractor responsibilities and performance.
  • 05 Risk, change and decision control.
  • 06 Engineering and operational interfaces.
  • 07 CDM, PUWER, machinery and functional safety requirements.
  • 08 FAT, commissioning and operational readiness.
  • 09 Documentation, handover and asset acceptance.
  • 10 Project resources, competence and governance.

Defined Management Outputs

What the Client Receives

Clear evidence, priorities and decisions that establish the project position and support a controlled route forward.

  • Verified project position
  • Clear scope, assumptions and exclusions
  • Executive RAG assessment
  • Prioritised risks and interventions
  • Commercial and contractor observations
  • Critical decisions required
  • 30/60/90-day control or recovery plan
  • Recommended project and resource structure
  • Executive findings workshop

Built to Support Management Decisions

The objective is not another report for the project folder.

It is an evidence-based management position that can support investment, recovery or delivery decisions.

Anonymised Project Evidence

Evidence from Industrial Projects

These examples demonstrate the value created by independently verifying the requirement, challenging assumptions and establishing the true project position.

CAPEX Definition

£4.186m ~£400k

Requirement reframed

£4.186m CAPEX Requirement Reframed to Approximately £400k

An industrial roof project had developed into a proposed CAPEX requirement of approximately £4.186 million.

Detailed review showed that the assumed project did not accurately reflect the client’s actual need. By understanding the condition, operational priorities and realistic scope, the project was reframed around the work genuinely required.

The project was reframed around a delivery requirement of approximately £400,000, rather than the original £4.186 million proposition.

The value was created before execution—by challenging the problem, not simply managing the proposed solution.

Scope & Commercial Challenge

45%

Approximately £38,000 reduction

45% Reduction Through Contractor and Scope Challenge

A production-line replacement in a live manufacturing environment required stronger control across requirements, FAT, civil preparation, services, installation, machinery safety, commissioning and handover.

Kampa challenged the contractor scope and commercial assumptions, reducing one proposed work package by approximately 45% - around £38,000.

The wider intervention brought FAT, multidisciplinary installation sequencing, compliance and operational handover into one controlled delivery structure.

Programme Recovery

Multi-Year

Infrastructure programme

Control Re-established on a Multi-Year Infrastructure Programme

Elements of a critical electrical infrastructure programme had been designed several years before formal CAPEX approval.

Technical work had progressed, but project governance, document ownership, integration responsibilities and completion evidence had not developed consistently alongside the programme.

Kampa was engaged to establish the true position, clarify ownership, manage outstanding dependencies and bring technical execution, safe sequencing, documentation and decision-making into a controlled project structure.

Client and project details are anonymised to protect confidentiality.

A Controlled Intervention

How Kampa Works

The approach is structured around four stages that move from understanding the underlying need to defining a practical, controlled route forward.

Understand the Business Need

Establish what outcome the investment must achieve and which decisions the client needs to make.

Verify the Position

Review the available commercial, project, engineering, compliance and operational evidence.

Challenge the Assumptions

Test whether the proposed scope, cost, programme and delivery model are necessary, complete and realistic.

Define the Controlled Route Forward

Present the verified position, required interventions, decisions and recommended delivery structure.

From Review into Recovery

Where required, Kampa can continue into project recovery or owner-side delivery using a project-specific team and resource plan.

Before Further CAPEX Is Committed

Do Not Manage the Wrong Project More Efficiently

A project can be professionally planned, governed and reported - and still be solving the wrong problem.

Before committing further CAPEX, mobilising contractors or adding resources, establish what actually needs to be delivered.

Kampa Advisors provides senior industrial project definition, independent health checks and recovery leadership where scope, governance, compliance and execution must stand up to challenge.

Establish the True Project Position
Kampa Advisors logo